The public is treated to a spectacle so grand that issues pertaining the indictment of celebrity personalities being involved in large scale larceny of public funds is so controversial that it literally became a staple of news for more than a month without let up.  What would happen if these people—legislators, businessmen and those very influential in the corridors of power—would be detained and thereupon after conviction, would be imprisoned, is what animates people from all walks of life.  Majority however are doubtful whether  these people, more than 200, more than those indicted in the grizzly crime imputed on Ampatuan, would really be punished at all.  And if perchance they would be detained, chances of living comfortably would be arranged.  Former Presidents had been accorded such treatments (former President Joseph Estrada was confined in his resort like vacation house in Tanay, Rizal; former President Gloria Arroyo is still in a private suite of the hospital).

Then came the off and on issue on VIP treatment in the penitentiary.  It is as if a bunch of prisoners were enjoying privileges which must be denied but inordinately offered on some people on whose stars are friendly to the powers that be.  When golf carts were used in penal facilities to fetch dying inmates to be brought to the prison hospital, there was a loud discounted howl.  But when a suspected plunderer is brought to trial, complete with all the amenities and security, on expensive convoy from a well ventilated penal facility to the court, there was just a little scream.  Indeed, there is a great divide even in the scale of criminal justice treatment.

When an unknown felon goes through the normal course of the judicial system, anything that favors him is seen as criminal.  When a celebrity felon goes through the normal course of the judicial system, anything that favors him is seen as technical.

Here however is the real score.

When a person is convicted, he becomes a denizen of prison and expected to go through the rigors of regimentation, disciplined climate, gross routine and every conceivable threat obtaining in a highly emotional environment. He may opt to be different from the rest. He may even call on the gods to make him special.  He can smuggle a set of golden utensils to match expensive foods delivered to him, walk on imported carpet, install an air conditioning unit, wear expensive clothing and jewelries and try to live through and serve time along with thieves, rapists, murderers a few paces away from him and still he is an inmate, a prey if not a target to be invaded and clobbered.  That is not what luxury is all about.  That is not even proximate to how one must live in comfort and stability.  That is even considered a nightmare.  His peers, felons of varying stripes, may swear to heavens that their bountiful fellow is very important but that is merely stretching the limits of sanity.  The more important, the more gifted, the more luxurious an inmate is, the lower he occupies in the so called food chain of the prison community.

Imagine a mansion built within a slum community.  Or try to wear your best jewels and stroll along a dimly lighted alley where half naked drunk looking denizens ogles at you.  If someone thinks it is a delight, then there is a problem somewhere between his ears.

The more amenities an inmate enjoys, the better he looks, the tastier he appears from the standpoint of predators just waiting at the wings.  The greater he projects, the worse he becomes.  For those observed as given by prison community as “VIP” the more disadvantage he turns out to be.  He is subject to internal or communal exploitation.  He is seen as a person to be abused, to be harassed, to be humiliated, to be threatened always.  While he may be looked up to as important, his capacity to be generous should never lessen unless he intends to be suicidal in the end.

In prison, it is the ordinary person that carries stability and normalcy.  While they may endure being faceless, they are never bothered at all.  They simply go through the normal process of communal living.

For those treated otherwise, treated with care and in style in prison, it is more of a curse than a blessing.


About vjtesoro

A perpetual student of Corrections

Posted on June 8, 2014, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. Roseller P. Remot

    It is the tag of being a prisoner (convicted of a committed crime making him a criminal) which labeled a felon as cursed who lost his freedom and is always subject to scrutiny plus the prying eyes of men. The ostentatious display of extravagance inside the prison walls, either by a famous, rich prisoner or a faceless, equally rich prisoner proves his love for materialism which makes him feel that he is still somebody who could sway influence to the lesser people like when he was wallowing in riches outside prison life. It is the special treatment by some unscrupulous prison officials which branded a prisoner as a VIP thereby aggravating his status as a criminal rather than as a human being entitled to correctional treatment by the very same officials who uphold and break he Bureau of Corrections law.


    • Roseller P. Remot

      The letter T before the word “he Bureau of Corrections…” on the last paragraph was erroneously deleted. My apology.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: